Posts Tagged ‘homosexuality’

h1

326: The Queer History of the Word “Gunsel”

9 January, 2012

The Shorter OED defines Gunsel as “1 A naive youth; a homosexual youth, … 2 An informer; a criminal, a gunman.” Merriam-Webter’s Unabridged is similar.

The older of the two meanings, in the U.S., was “homosexual,” and the word was used with only this meaning in Dashiell Hammett’s novel The Maltese Falcon. However, when that novel was translated to the screen in 1941 (starring Humphrey Bogart), the film was “one of many of the era that … could only hint at homosexuality.” [Wikipedia] The hint was subtle indeed. When one character who frequently brandished a gun was repeatedly called a “gunsel,” most moviegoers thought that the unfamiliar word meant “gunman” or “gunslinger.” This mistake, owing to the fame of the film, eventually became an accepted alternative meaning.

Pauline Kael once mentioned that she had a very high regard for the 1941 film, for its original cinematic qualities and pacing. However, the film is, almost shot for shot, a literal translation of the novel. Many of its virtues are not original in film, but were derived from the book. It’s possible that Kael hadn’t read the novel (at the time, I didn’t venture to ask her that, because I hadn’t read it then, either.)

<END>

h1

204: God Hates Homosexuals?

3 March, 2011

As queer (yes) as it may seem, those Westboro folk may be on to something. You will recall the injunction “Be fruitful and multiply.” That is, Yahweh (the Abrahamic god) wants there to be lots of human beings, just as human farmers want their own crops to breed and flourish. Homosexual people have fewer children, statistically, than hetros; in most cases, none. God is displeased, because he enjoys the taste of fresh soul and can’t get enough. Therefore, the more human beings the better, even if they overwhelm the planet and cause the extinction of thousands of other kinds of beings. It isn’t just the same, eating rabbit soul, when you can gorge on the top earthly predator, i.e., us. God must feel threatened when He looks down and sees people voluntarily not reproducing, and yet they take bread from the mouths of those willing and able to breed again and again. There are pests loose on the farm, and they must be eradicated, ’cause they’re buggering the crop yield.

But the idea that God kills U.S. soldiers is truly stupid; service members are just the kind of healthy, vigorous breeding stock that He wants to see more of on the farm, not fewer. And they’re good eatin’, too.

<END>

h1

192: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

21 December, 2010

We have gone beyond Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) now; but for its day it was a progressive measure. Judging by the press coverage in the past few months, most people think that DADT was a evil policy advocated by homophobes. But not entirely.

Consider that DADT put an end to

.. Soldiers asking other soldiers if they were “queers”, or accusing them of being “one of those fairy types”.

.. Draft boards asking registrants if they had “homosexual tendencies” — and yes, draft boards are still with us.

.. And so on.

The downside was not being able to tell others a large part of who you were. A steep price to pay, but the gain with DADT was still positive, especially considering that no more-liberal policy could have been put into effect at that time.

<END>

 

h1

189: Get It Up? Get Out!

9 December, 2010

“Czech test for gay asylum seekers scrutinized: The Czech government has rejected criticism of its use of a test of the credibility of gay asylum seekers. The Vienna-based European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights said the Czech Republic is the only known E.U. country to use “phallometric testing.” The method tests whether men seeking asylum on the grounds of homosexuality are sexually aroused by heterosexual pornographic material.”

Washington Post, 9 December 2010, page A10

I guess we can call this the “lay detector”. Who is watching the subjects to assess the results of these tests? What are the exact pass/fail criteria? (Stiffness? Degrees above the horizontal? Duration of the effect? Are there drug tests to make sure none of the applicants have taken Levitra for penile levitation?) In any case, the test seems highly phall-able.

<END>

h1

148: Are we kinky yet?

25 February, 2010

from a book review by Michael Dirda, Washington Post, 25 February 2010, page C9:

“The tacitly homosexual relationship of Witold and Fryderyk further intensifies the book’s perfervid kinkiness.”

(aren’t we past writing things like this?)

h1

121: “Homosexual” and “Heterosexual”

30 July, 2009

Both these terms are unfortunate, because they focus on the sexual aspect of a person in whom, perhaps, sex has only a small role.

There are problems with “straight”, too (are the others “bent”?) and “gay” (but some are morose.)

See the Scientific American article “Equal right to kiss? Why you may be disgusted by gay behavior without knowing it”, at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=unconscious-disgust-gay-behavior&sc=DD  20090618 (posted 18 June 2009 on http://www.sciam.com).

(Is all ‘gay behavior’ sexual?)

<END>

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 151 other followers