Archive for December, 2009

h1

142: Movie Music

December 3, 2009

I like film (and TV) scores. Music from studio films is often released in CD or download formats. Many of the great scores of the past were French: Tirez sure le Pianiste (music by Georges Delerue); Cleo de 5 a 7 (Michel Legrand); Jules et Jim (Delerue); Parapluies de Cherbourg (Legrand). In the 1930s and 40s, many composers influenced by Mahler fled to the U.S. and found jobs in Hollywood; a major improvement in Hollywood film music was one result. (If you think that Mahler ‘sounds like movie music’ you’re right, in a way; but it’s the other way ’round.) Recent American (or mostly American) films with superlative music include Kill Bill 1, Collateral, Paycheck, and of course The Mission.

I also like Radio IO (www.radioio.com). If you pay an annual subscription, you get music, and only  music, streamed to your computer; you avoid the really annoying ads their no-pay audio channels run. So I’m happy to pay to hear music that no station in this area (Washington, D.C.) would touch — including serious classical music (rather than ‘safe’ classical music), — and an all-soundtracks channel.

What I don’t like are soundtracks presented one cut at a time, five minutes of Star Wars and then three minutes of Dexter and four minutes of Titanic, and so on. I want to hear the composer’s presentation of his music straight through, just as I want to see a film straight through, see a play straight through, and hear a symphony straight through.

I sent this message to Michael Matheny at RadioIO: “Excellent choices. But it’s disconcerting to hear the music jumping from album to album, rather than playing complete scores. Music for a film should be heard as a whole, just as films should be seen as a whole, not jumbled up with scenes from other films.”

I received a response, making the point that some cuts in a soundtrack album are weaker than others. That’s true. But some symphonic movements (the classical third movement in many cases) can be weaker than the other three movements. We don’t skip them just because they’re pretty much a change of pace, a breather before the heavy stuff begins again. There’s a reason the composer wrote these movements, and we need to recognize that. And soundtrack albums aren’t literally what you heard in a theatre; the composer has room to ‘revise and extend his remarks’ as they say in the Senate; to shape an album from the music he composed for a film (some of which may not have made it into the theatrical release); to create an artistic whole. This, also, should be recognized; and respected.

Also, it isn’t the case that RadioIO just skips an inferior cut here and there — their soundtracks channel plays one cut from film ‘A’ and then switches to film ‘B’, and then on to ‘C’. If you wait long enough, you’ll hear the ‘A’ cut you should have heard where it belonged.

<END>

h1

141: Sex Junk Emails V: “How please knocking-out hottie”

December 3, 2009

More of those ‘how dumb do you think guys are?’ junk emails (verbatim extracts):

=============================================================

Accidentally sent you money

How please knocking-out hottie

===

Like to protect your love-gun from failures?

Easy as damn it! One pilule from our store is a full protection of such kind, plus you get more pleasure and give more pleasure also!

You will Never have your face turned red of shame. Buy a ticket to success.

===

LOL! Bruce got small one

===

Wow-arouse-maker for you!

===

Order now and drill her tonight!

Once your body gets such power stimulus as our products provide? You get stallion power and eagerness. All girls need it, all girls want it from you. Give it to her and be her King!

===

Staff training

Improving your love talents is no problem at all with our products!

Try now or you will regret later. Super boooost and super endurance for your pecker? No matter of his previous condition.

===

I left note on table

This simple sure has helped thousands of men to feel tension in pants again!

===

Popping our pellets is like saying “get up!” to your nether rod.

Be sure that her will.

===

Have a concrete thing in pants!

===

All girls agree to pull panties down, when they see such concrete male-power!

===

Super vitamin for giving your love accumulator a new charge.

===

Mexican girl sucks Nazi-rod

Let Us Help!

Your trousers will have a huge bulge again, after you try our pilules.

===

Permanent En1argedPenis, Dr. Guaranteeed Up To 3 Inches Increased & 40% wider in 60 days or less tny lmh

===

Defend your manhood’s activity

===

Endless joy of humping

===

“\FEEL ITSELF REAL MEN.\”=

Give your wang bulldozer power!

===

Boost your virile thing!

Delicate male problem solution

===

We must be solidly indemnified

Supply your organ

===

My fingers fidget like ten idle brats

Your swell will show her your passion. Yes, as it was when you were a teen!

===

Bulldozer lovepower Muse for night deeds

===

Are you really HAPPY with yourPenis Size?

* PermanentPenis En1argement – En1arge up to 3-4 inches in length in just weeks!

* Create a BiggerPenisHead – Create a more muscular mushroomed looking PenisHead!

===

You’ll feel yourself with women like Michael Jordan with ball and hoop.

===

Never feel uncharged in bed

Improve your spire, make is able to punish her or lift her to heavens.

===

Horny Goat Weed — Does it Rejuvenate  iLbido?

Biig structure, smalll price tag; Wisconsin town offers defunct bridge for $1

===

Give her ham wallet good drilling

===

Screw her rabbit hole

===

A huge tool in your shed

===

Bigger your ShortPenis – 100% Natural EnlargementPills is Safe & Effective! gapd bz

===

Profit huedgertonge with eBay!

===

Best manure for pork stalk — Get to know the secret of perfect seducion.

===

More and more times a night — Dont you see her cheating you?

===

Sneaky Tricks to Blast Her Into Exploasive Orgasms – Master These Moves to Drive Her Weild in sex!

– Woman, 82, gets ticket for slow crossssing

===

<END>

h1

140: Another Word for the No-No List

December 3, 2009

The following is what you get on Google when you include ‘Jew’ as one of your search terms. Another word has become unusable. (And now we are also not supposed to use “at risk” — a smarmy term, that, but replaced by an even worse one: “at promise”. (see Washington Post, various articles, November 2009). What’s next?

=================================================

An explanation of our search results.

If you recently used Google to search for the word “Jew,” you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We’d like to explain why you’re seeing these results when you conduct this search.

A site’s ranking in Google’s search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page’s relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for “Jew” brings up one such unexpected result.

If you use Google to search for “Judaism,” “Jewish” or “Jewish people,” the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for “Jew” different? One reason is that the word “Jew” is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word “Jewish” when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:

Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like “Judaism,” “Jewish people,” or “Jews” than the single word “Jew.” In fact, prior to this incident, the word “Jew” only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it’s likely that the great majority of searches on Google for “Jew” are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.

The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.

We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.

Sincerely,
The Google Team”

<END>